- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 10:32:03 -0400
- To: public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org
Agenda for today's call, 1:00-2:30pm EDT Monday 9 June. A. meps-vs-iops document[1]. Walk through to see if we are in agreement. - The latest update starts to model the IOPs as using message transmission *without* conservation of messages. Is this helpful? Are they worth including? What about faults? - Sections on "Modeling Objective" and "Modeling Notation". Are these acceptable? - Consider focussing on one IOP (such as IOP#2), and do a depth-first analysis of the various corresponding MEPs 1. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs-iops_clean.htm -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Monday, 9 June 2003 10:32:08 UTC