- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:00:10 -0400
- To: public-ws-desc-meps@w3.org
Sorry, this accidentally went out to the wrong email address. >Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 15:35:22 -0400 >To: public-ws-desc-meps-request@w3.org >From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org> >Subject: Agenda for teleconference 12:00noon EDT Wednesday > >Agenda for tomorrow's teleconference: > >A. Amy's comments[3]. Is it helpful to have precise comparisons of >patterns and pattern styles first? Or should we shift gears and start by >debating the strengths and weaknesses of PART2[2]? > >B. meps-vs-iops document[1] updates. The latest update starts to model >the IOPs as using message transmission *without* conservation of >messages. Is this helpful? Are they worth including? What about faults? > >C. meps-vs-iops document[1] updates: Sections on "Modeling Objective" and >"Modeling Notation". Are these acceptable? > > >1. meps-vs-iops: >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/meps-vs-iops/meps-vs-iops_clean.htm >2. PART2: >http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12-patterns.xml >3. Amy's comments: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-meps/2003May/0018.html > >-- >David Booth >W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard >Telephone: +1.617.253.1273 -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:00:16 UTC