- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:46:18 -0500
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF978833C1.AD017B17-ON85256FA5.005BDD8C-85256FA5.005C2108@ca.ibm.com>
Hugo,
My Ant script does XML validation, but only checks well-formedness, not
DTD validation.
I am very interested in doing schema validation. I can provide a schema
for the Z namespace. We'll need to modify the xmlspec schema to allow that
namespace.
Arthur Ryman,
Rational Desktop Tools Development
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
02/11/2005 11:13 AM
To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
Subject
Validation of XML of WSDL 2.0 drafts
Hi Arthur.
I have fixed the mark-up in Part 1 as it wasn't valid:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml.diff?r1=1.162&r2=1.164&f=h
In order to have this happen automatically again in the build process,
I've updated the DTD to include your Z notation:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/xmlspec.dtd.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6&f=h
I've done it in a quick and dirty way, but it basically works and I
now get useful information out of the DTD validation. Please validate
against it when you do edits so that the spec stays in a good shape.
Since obviously DTDs are not well adapted to the flexibility of
namespaces, I'm not opposed to something like schema validation if you
feel like it.
Cheers,
Hugo
--
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: signature.asc
Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 18:24:42 UTC