- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:46:18 -0500
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF978833C1.AD017B17-ON85256FA5.005BDD8C-85256FA5.005C2108@ca.ibm.com>
Hugo, My Ant script does XML validation, but only checks well-formedness, not DTD validation. I am very interested in doing schema validation. I can provide a schema for the Z namespace. We'll need to modify the xmlspec schema to allow that namespace. Arthur Ryman, Rational Desktop Tools Development phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/ Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org> 02/11/2005 11:13 AM To Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc public-ws-desc-eds@w3.org Subject Validation of XML of WSDL 2.0 drafts Hi Arthur. I have fixed the mark-up in Part 1 as it wasn't valid: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20.xml.diff?r1=1.162&r2=1.164&f=h In order to have this happen automatically again in the build process, I've updated the DTD to include your Z notation: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/xmlspec.dtd.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6&f=h I've done it in a quick and dirty way, but it basically works and I now get useful information out of the DTD validation. Please validate against it when you do edits so that the spec stays in a good shape. Since obviously DTDs are not well adapted to the flexibility of namespaces, I'm not opposed to something like schema validation if you feel like it. Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: signature.asc
Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 18:24:42 UTC