- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:18:41 -0700
- To: "'John Kaputin \(gmail\)'" <jakaputin@gmail.com>
- Cc: <woden-dev@ws.apache.org>, "John Kaputin" <KAPUTIN@uk.ibm.com>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <003a01c6f147$21d02920$3901a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a CR055 [1]. The Working Group accepted your proposed fix [2], along with additional work [3], and has been implemented in the latest editor's draft [4, 5]. Unless you let us know otherwise by the end of October, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR055 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Sep/0004.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Sep/0008.html [4] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-transfer-coding-relate [5] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#_http_binding_default_rule_coding Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail) Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 5:13 AM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org; John Kaputin Subject: Clarification needed on HTTP Transfer Coding Can someone please clarify some points about the http transer coding extension properties defined in Part 2 section 6.8.2 Relationship to WSDL Component Model [1]? It says the Binding has a {http transfer coding default} property that is available to InterfaceMessageReference and InterfaceFaultReference components. Is this worded correctly? Do components from the abstract interface need http binding information? It also says BindingOperation has a {http transfer coding default} property that is available to BindingMessageReference and BindingFault components. Is 'BindingFault' a mistake, should this say BindingFaultReference? There are no semantic rules about the relationship between the two {http transfer coding default} properties (i.e. in Binding and BindingOperation), so they could potentially be different. I don't think this would make sense, but it seems to be possible according to the way this section is described. Finally, there are no semantic rules about the relationship between BindingOperation's {http transfer coding default} property and the {http transfer coding} properties if its two child components. As an implementor I can infer what that relationship might be, but it would be better if the spec stated in explicitly as it does for default and actual extension properties elsewhere. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html ?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#http-transfer-coding-relate regards, John Kaputin.
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 17:18:46 UTC