- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:35:03 -0800
- To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a CR014 [1]. The Working Group adopted your proposal. This resolution is reflected in the latest draft [2]. Unless you let us know otherwise by 13 April, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR014 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts. html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#soap-protocol-relate [ Jonathan Marsh ][ jmarsh@microsoft.com ][ http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes ] -----Original Message----- From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Glen Daniels Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 7:07 AM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: CR ISSUE : Bug in SOAP binding (Section 5.5.2 of Adjuncts) Hi folks: As mentioned in today's F2F meeting, I would like to raise the following issue against the Adjuncts document... Section 5.5.2 [1] currently states that the {soap underlying protocol} property contains an IRI *to the Binding component*. This is not correct, and in fact I believe we meant to say something along the lines of: --- begin --- A xs:anyURI, which is an absolute IRI as defined by [IETF RFC 3987]. This IRI refers to an appropriate SOAP underlying protocol binding (see [SOAP Binding Framework]), which is to be used for any of the SOAP interactions described by the WSDL Binding. ---- end ---- I propose we fix this by using the above text (with editorial discretion). Thanks, --Glen [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-adjuncts-20060106/#soap-protocol-rel ate
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 23:36:21 UTC