- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:37:39 -0800
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC345 [1]. This opened up discussion on a number of improvements and clarifications to this capability. The Working Group agreed to implement proposals at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/09/wsdl20-adjuncts.html#_http_serializa tion and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Nov/0020.html, plus change the "/" syntax to an attribute. Rather than peruse those proposals, you might instead see the fixes incorporated into our latest editor's draft [2]. As we plan to go to CR shortly, if we don't hear from you within 10 days, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC345 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts. html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Kendall Clark Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 6:18 AM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded serializatin S-Desc, I'm writing on behalf of DAWG, which is using WSDL 2.0 to specify the SPARQL Protocol for RDF [1]. We have a couple of LC comments about WSDL 2.0, and I'll be sending each one in a separate message. This message contains the last LC comment we intend to raise at this time. We have added a POST binding for our sole operation, query, because we anticipate there being SPARQL queries, perhaps autogenerated ones, that are too long to transmit reliably over GET, serialized into a URI. Therefore, we added a POST binding, and we'd like the serialization of the input message for that POST operation to be application/x-www-form-urlencoded. We do not have an XML serialization of SPARQL's surface syntax, so that we cannot POST application/xml. As with our other two comments, we raise this because we'd like to use WSDL 2.0 to describe our service *accurately* and completely. Cheers, Kendall Clark [1] http://www.w3.org/sw/2001/DataAccess/proto-wd/
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 22:55:20 UTC