- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:38:44 -0800
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 22:52:38 UTC
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC353 [1]. We accepted the proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Nov/0008.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0051.html> to address this problem. As we plan to go to CR shortly, if we don't hear from you within 10 days, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC353 ________________________________ From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:06 PM To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org Subject: What is a valid WSDL component model? Part 1 claims, "An XML 1.0 document that is valid with respect to the WSDL 2.0 XML Schema and that maps to a valid WSDL 2.0 Component Model is conformant to the WSDL 2.0 specification." [1] What is a valid WSDL 2.0 Component Model? Part 1 does not describe this. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050803/#markup Regards, Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 22:52:38 UTC