- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:41:08 -0800
- To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirv@webmethods.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
In response to this issue [1] the Working Group agreed to add text stating that a SOAP abstract feature is also (by definition) an abstract WSDL feature. We'll assume you agree with this resolution if we don't hear from you by the end of February. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC18 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 7:02 PM > To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org' > Subject: Relationship between Features and SOAP Modules ?? > > > ref: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#soap- > module-decl > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-20040803/#Feature > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-extensions-20040803/#app-data > [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-extensions-20040803/#adf-mu- > att > [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-extensions-20040803/#adf- > module > > Reading thru parts 1, 2 and 3, my question is what is the relationship > between Features and SOAP Modules? I do not see any concrete text that > establishes any relationship between Features and SOAP Modules. > However, the > application data feature and application data module [3][4][5] assumes > that > there is a relationship. If there is a relationship, shall we describe > it > clearly in part 1 and 3? As an implementer, I would like to see it. > > Regards, > Asir S Vedamuthu > asirv at webmethods dot com > http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2005 23:41:34 UTC