- From: Liu, Kevin <kevin.liu@sap.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 00:18:12 +0200
- To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
- Cc: "Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com)" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 22:18:55 UTC
Issue 1: the spec and the schema is inconsistent. In the spec, address is an "optional" attribute of endpoint <endpoint name="xs:NCName" binding="xs:QName" address="xs:anyURI"? > <documentation />? [ <feature /> | <property /> ]* </endpoint> The address attribute is not defined in the schema @ http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/ <http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/> <xs:complexType name="EndpointType" mixed="false"> <http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/#> - <xs:complexContent> <http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/#> - <xs:extension base="wsdl:ExtensibleDocumentedType"> <http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/#> - <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element name="feature" type="wsdl:FeatureType" /> <xs:element name="property" type="wsdl:PropertyType" /> <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" /> </xs:choice> <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:NCName" use="required" /> <xs:attribute name="binding" type="xs:QName" use="required" /> </xs:extension> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> Issue2: why the address attribute is optional? The spec doesn't say anything about under what situation the address attribute may be left out. What's an endpoint without a network address? Best Regards, Kevin
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 22:18:55 UTC