- From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:24:30 -0400
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
I thought the decision was specifically to use "client" -- not "consumer", although "consumer" was mentioned by someone. On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 16:31, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > For the record, the Working Group agreed to use the terms "Web service" > and either "client" or "consumer" in Parts 1, 2, 3, and the Primer. If > we don't hear from you by Oct 21st we'll assume you agree with this > resolution. > > [See http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC30] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sanjiva Weerawarana > > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 11:41 AM > > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > > Subject: use of provider agent & requestor agent terms in the spec > > > > > > The part1 spec (in the mandatory extensions section and the > conformance > > section) uses the terms "provider agent" and "requestor" agent. IBM > > would like to see these terms removed as they are not used elsewhere > > in the specs. > > > > Sanjiva. -- David Booth W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 19:24:32 UTC