- From: Ugo Corda <Ugo.Corda@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:24:44 -0800
- To: "Wilson, MD \(Michael\)" <M.D.Wilson@rl.ac.uk>, "Adomas Svirskas" <adomas@svirskas.com>
- Cc: "WS-Choreography List" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>, <jochen.haller@sap.com>, <doserj@inf.ethz.ch>
Hi Michael, Have you guys thought of the possibility of using BPMN instead of UML activity diagrams? Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wilson, > MD (Michael) > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 8:04 AM > To: Adomas Svirskas > Cc: WS-Choreography List; jochen.haller@sap.com; doserj@inf.ethz.ch > Subject: RE: WS-CDL based implementations in TrustCoM > > > > Adomas > > The approach taken in the TrustCoM project is for a person > who wishes to form a Virtual Organisation to define the > co-operative business processes for that VO as UML activity > diagrams including annotations for security, quality, and > cost constraints that are enforced through contracts and SLA. > The UML diagrams are refined into a CDL, which in turn is > refined into a BPEL description for each organisation in the > VO, incorporating WSDL interfaces to the other VO member services. > > The responsibilities within the TrustCoM project are: > > UML to CDL - Jurgen Doser at ETH, Zurich [doserj@inf.ethz.ch] > CDL to BPEL - Jochen Haller of SAP Research [jochen.haller@sap.com] > > > Michael Wilson > Manager, W3C Office in the UK and Ireland > CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory > Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK > http://www.bitd.clrc.ac.uk/Person/M.D.Wilson > Fax: +44 1235 445831 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > The information contained in this message is confidential and > intended only for the individual named above. If you are not > the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering it to > the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or disclosure of this > information is prohibited and may be unlawful. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adomas Svirskas [mailto:adomas@svirskas.com] > Sent: 13 December 2005 15:53 > To: Wilson, MD (Michael) > Cc: WS-Choreography List > Subject: WS-CDL based implementations in TrustCoM > > Hello Michael, > > I want to ask you about the status of WS-CDL related > implementations - I remember there were plans and promises > from either SAP or ETH (or both) side to develop such tools. > > The reason I am asking about this is the following: I happen > to participate as a guest in W3C Web Services Choreography > Working Group F2F meeting here in London > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2005Dec/at > t-0006/Age > nda-Dec-F2F-0.txt) > and the question of the WS-CDL usage status in TrustCoM came up. > > The WS-CDL spec approaches the Proposed Recommendation phase, > there is a need to know about the existing implementations > and, in particular, generation of end-point from choreography > description. > > I do not know who is directly responsible at the moment for > these tools in TrustCoM (Jochen Haller of SAP Research?). > > The W3C Web Services Choreography Working Group would be > interested to hear about the status of the implementation and > get in contact with the people involved directly. > > A note for the WS-CHOR group: Prof. Michael Wilson is the > Programme Manager for the TrustCoM Project - > http://www.eu-trustcom.com/index.php?page=Contact > > Many thanks, > Adomas > > >
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 05:00:10 UTC