Re: Asynchronous Service Access Protocol (ASAP)

I find it continually interesting that we see such initiatives as ASAP  
that fail to mention how they fit with respect to us. They never do  
this with BPEL (must be the proliferation of marketing dollars) of  
course. I find it rather a shame. Certainly if it were an academic  
paper given the words used, failure to reference WS-CDL would be  
grounds for failure. Certainly would not get int oa conference.

Cheers

Steve T

On 5 Aug 2005, at 18:54, Charlton Barreto wrote:

>
> This effort seems to focus on service contracts rather than  
> collaboration. It may be something useful for WS-CDL in terms of  
> defining collaborations with ASAP services. I'm interested in what  
> develops in this effort and how we can ensure it can be leveraged by  
> WS-CDL....
>
> On 03/08/2005, at 11:26, Steve Ross-Talbot wrote:
>
>>
>> I got this from a trusted friend. I have asked Keith (the author) how  
>> this fits with WS-CDL. Any comments anyone?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Steve T
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>
>>> Am I missing something, or is this just a lame attempt at doing the  
>>> same things as WS-CDL? -  
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=asap or  
>>> more specifically  
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/7590/ 
>>> ASAP_BrainStorm.ppt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 7 August 2005 18:04:41 UTC