- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:35:42 -0800
- To: "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
mm2: Reference my comment in today's call. As another note, Tony's proposal may also be affected by Proposal 6 (extends). >Fletcher2: Dear Monica, >Drowned in email yet again! Thank you for this. We had an inconclusive >discussion last week - I hope we perhaps conclude this week. You were >correct - there was a bit of a Gotcha in include which includes the fact >that you can not nest package structures not just that you can not have two >root choreos. Turns out you have to use Xpath to pull out the bit which >will fit. I think folk just wanted the detailed problems put before them. > > >>Fletcher: Dear Colleagues, >> Given the current push on getting proposals in at the moment, I would >>like to (re-)submit the attached two proposals for consideration by >>the group. Comments welcome as usual. >> >> >mm1: Tony, your proposal regarding the initial choreography touches in >part on 1 or more points I made when we discussed import, choreography >dependencies and my questions on Issue 687.3 [1].....I think we should establish dependencies, whether we >do it in by priority, order, or another mechanism...... Thanks. > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Oct/0025.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Jul/0015.html >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 20:35:45 UTC