- From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:14:45 -0800
- To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
- Cc: "WS Chor Editors (E-mail)" <member-ws-chor-editors@w3.org>
At 01:47 PM 1/29/2004, Burdett, David wrote: >It would be normative in that it is the definitive authority. So if there >were was (which we hope not) an inconsistency between the "Primer" and the >"Descrption Language" specs then the Description Language spec should be >relied on. > >... or are you asking about the generating process language definitions >from CDL ... in that case, I (and I also think the other editors) have not >formed any clear view although we all thought that the potential value >meant that we should discuss the idea on the list. I was asking about the mapping/generation description from cdl to a concrete execution/programming language. I have to think about whether it should be an example (proof of concept) or a normative specification of exactly how to do such a mapping. It's worth some discussion. cheers, jeff >David > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jeff Mischkinsky >[<mailto:jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>mailto:jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 10:40 AM >To: Burdett, David; WS Choreography (E-mail) >Cc: WS Chor Editors (E-mail) >Subject: Re: WS Choreography Deliverables > >At 11:18 PM 1/28/2004, Burdett, David wrote: > >As promised in the conference call on Tuesday, here's the draft of the WS > >Choreography Deliverables document that describes what the editors think > >should be the deliverables of the group. It identifies two main documents: > > * A "WS Choreography Primer", which would be non-normative > > * A "WS Choreography Description Language", which would be normative > >It also identifies one possible additional document that would describe > >how to generate process language definitions (e.g. BPEL) for a role from a > >Choreography Definition. > >Would that be normative or more in the nature of an informative appendix or >note? > >cheers, > jeff > > > > >Comments are welcome. > > > >David > > > > > >Director, Standards Strategy > >Commerce One > >One Market Street, Steuart Tower, Suite 1300, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA > >Tel/VMail: +1 (415) 644 8700; Cell: +1 (925) 216 7704 > ><<<mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone. > com>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com>; > >Web: > <<<http://www.commerceone.com/>http://www.commerceone.com/>http://www.commerceone.com> > > > > >Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com >Consulting Member Technical Staff +1(650)506-1975 >Director, Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9 >Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com Consulting Member Technical Staff +1(650)506-1975 Director, Web Services Standards 500 Oracle Parkway M/S 4OP9 Oracle Corporation Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 00:27:01 UTC