W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Burdett 1/20/2004: Auction Use Case

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 11:55:51 -0700
To: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
Cc: "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-id: <4016B437.7040803@sun.com>

mm2: See below.

> Burdett: Thanks for the feedback. I've made some comments in line. 
> I've also attached an updated use case (it's only 9k) to hopefully 
> clarify some of the points you made.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:39 PM
> To: Burdett, David
> Cc: WS Choreography (E-mail)
> Subject: Burdett 1/20/2004: Auction Use Case
> .....mm1:  * Registration may occur outside of the choreography. 
> Implies context / policy items.
> .....Burdett2: I also agree that it does imply some context/policy 
> terms since there is a dependency between the registration and auction 
> choreographies. The question is, how should this be handled from a 
> choreography persective.
> mm1: Need to differentiate notification messages. They are not the 
> same, and processing or implications will be different.  Differences 
> may be understood above the choreography [1].
> Burdett2: I agree. However, I think it is quite realistic that a 
> choreography designer, however misguided, might want to use the same 
> message for different purposes as they contain the same content even 
> though the semantics are different because they are being used in a 
> different part of the choreography. The question is should the CDL 
> allow this or should we require that each message/interaction in a 
> choreography definition be different?
> [1] possible business semantics May also impact auction status or search.
mm2: Steve and Martin, I think we have two discussion items here for the 
reqts document and WS-CDL in general. On notification messages, this is 
one area where the differentiation is understood at the business, not 
necessarily in WS-CDL.
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:45:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC