Re: [xml-dev] What do want in a FAQ for a new spec

Rex Brooks wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks,
> 
> Please excuse the cross post, but I'm looking for two kinds of
> questions that you want answered when you are evaluating a new
> specification to decide if you think it is worth exploring further to
> determine if you think it is ready for adoption.
> 
> First, what is most immediately important, or else you wont look further.

I can't say that this is #1, but I always look at who's behind the
specification in terms of both authors (vendors/federal
agencies/consulting firms, etc.) and consortium (if there is a
consortium).

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World

> Second, what do you look for in ease of implementation.
> 
> I am asking because I'm helping with a FAQ for a spec that is moving
> toward approval, and we need to build a FAQ to help evaluators make
> these kinds of decisions.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rex
> --
> Rex Brooks
> GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
> W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
> Email: rexb@starbourne.com
> Tel: 510-849-2309
> Fax: By Request
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>

Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 18:21:24 UTC