- From: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:45:30 -0500
- To: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, Burdett David <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Andrew Berry <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>, WS Choreography <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Same with ebXML Registry. I think I should defer to Farrukh at this point for a more detailed explanation. :) Ugo Corda wrote: > > I am not sure what you mean by "a Web Service that is external to the > registry contents". In UDDI, all interactions with registry contents > occur via Web service interfaces, and I thought the same was true for > the ebXML Registry. > > Ugo > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:37 AM > > To: Ugo Corda > > Cc: Monica J. Martin; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew > > Berry; Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography > > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub > > > > > > I believe that that is certainly one possible approach, and > > if there were open Web Services eventing standards (meaning > > open standards body) available at the time that the Event > > Notification feature were architected it may/may not have > > been done this way. However, would it be possible (or even > > efficient) to have a subscriber be notified by a Web Service > > that is external to the registry contents about and event > > that happened to a RegistryObject within the registry? I > > could be off base, but it seems to me that a more efficient > > approach is to have the subscription "close" to the contents > > themselves. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Joe Chiusano > > > > Ugo Corda wrote: > > > > > > I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would > > subscribe to > > > the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get > > > notifications on events related to the contents you > > describe. Is that > > > not so? > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Ugo > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > > > > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM > > > > To: Monica J. Martin > > > > Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; Steve > > > > Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography > > > > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub > > > > > > > > > > > > It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry adopt > > > > WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of their main > > > > mission. The event notification feature of the registry > > is based on > > > > registry contents (subscriptions to RegistryObjects, etc.) rather > > > > than subscriptions to Web Services themselves. > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Joe Chiusano > > > > Member, ebXML Registry TC > > > > > > > > "Monica J. Martin" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Corda: Farrukh, > > > > > > > > > > > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the > > emerging pub/sub > > > > > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification? > > > > > > > > > > > >Thank you, > > > > > >Ugo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the > > > > > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary > > > > > specifications. > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:46:17 UTC