- From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:42:20 -0800
- To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>, "Burdett David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS Choreography" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
I am not sure what you mean by "a Web Service that is external to the registry contents". In UDDI, all interactions with registry contents occur via Web service interfaces, and I thought the same was true for the ebXML Registry. Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:37 AM > To: Ugo Corda > Cc: Monica J. Martin; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew > Berry; Steve Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub > > > I believe that that is certainly one possible approach, and > if there were open Web Services eventing standards (meaning > open standards body) available at the time that the Event > Notification feature were architected it may/may not have > been done this way. However, would it be possible (or even > efficient) to have a subscriber be notified by a Web Service > that is external to the registry contents about and event > that happened to a RegistryObject within the registry? I > could be off base, but it seems to me that a more efficient > approach is to have the subscription "close" to the contents > themselves. > > Kind Regards, > Joe Chiusano > > Ugo Corda wrote: > > > > I would have thought that an ebXML Registry client would > subscribe to > > the Registry itself (seen as a Web service) in order to get > > notifications on events related to the contents you > describe. Is that > > not so? > > > > Thank you, > > Ugo > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > > > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:02 AM > > > To: Monica J. Martin > > > Cc: Ugo Corda; Farrukh Najmi; Burdett David; Andrew Berry; Steve > > > Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography > > > Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub > > > > > > > > > It would also be highly unlikely that the ebXML Registry adopt > > > WS-Eventing or WS-Notification from the standpoint of their main > > > mission. The event notification feature of the registry > is based on > > > registry contents (subscriptions to RegistryObjects, etc.) rather > > > than subscriptions to Web Services themselves. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > Joe Chiusano > > > Member, ebXML Registry TC > > > > > > "Monica J. Martin" wrote: > > > > > > > > >Corda: Farrukh, > > > > > > > > > >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the > emerging pub/sub > > > > >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification? > > > > > > > > > >Thank you, > > > > >Ugo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mm1: I believe someone on this list has already questioned the > > > > implications of any open standards' body adopting proprietary > > > > specifications. > > > >
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 14:42:21 UTC