- From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:26:47 -0800
- To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Cc: "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>, creed@opengis.org
Hi All, If location is going to be addressed within W3C choreography and OASIS UDDI, I believe that it would be wise to consult and liaise with both the OGC, Open GIS Consortium, whose Executive Director, Carl Reed, I am copying and the OASIS Emergency Management GIS Subcommittee, of which he is also the chair. I wholeheartedly recommend including ebXML Reg/Rep in exploring an inclusive harmonization of semantics wrt Web Services. As co-chair of the OASIS HumanMarkup TC, and a member of EM GIS SC, and WSRP TC respectively, I try to keep current with these work areas. I have also looked at the Requirement document and this looks a bit more complicated than necessary, especially for a requirements document. Also, I'm not sure a new rdf:Bag for extended metadata is required. If we are at the requirements gathering phase, then I would ask the inference engine makers what they need, unless that is what you all have already done. Of course, I also thought you were the inference engine makers, and the document appears to bely that assumption. Ciao, Rex At 6:09 AM -0700 2/15/04, Monica J. Martin wrote: >>SRT: All: >> >>Given the request for review and given that choreographies may be >>subject to something similar for location it is a good idea if we >>start the process of review and requirements gathering for this >>piece of work and then get back to them in a timely fashion. > >mm1: Steve, these requirements should be generic as Reg/Rep also >handles web services and had a Semantic Content Management subgroup. >Suggest we distribute to both groups. Kathryn Breininger is the >OASIS co-chair (kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com) and Farrukh Najmi, >the technical lead (farrukh.najmi@sun.com). > >Thanks. > >>>Resent-From: public-sws-ig@w3.org >>>From: Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> >>>Date: 6 February 2004 03:02:05 GMT >>>To: public-sws-ig@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, >>>semanticweb@yahoogroups.com >>>Subject: UDDI and sematics >>> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>As some of you may be aware, UDDI Technical Committee is >>>considering to add some semantic capabilities in the next version. >>> >>>I would invite a wider community to review our attempts. >>> >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5337/uddi-spec-tc- >>>req11-14-semantics-20040205.doc >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5322/uddi-spec-tc- >>>taxonomies-discussion-20040205.doc >>> >>>Your feedback is very welcome. Feel free to say that we are on a >>>wrong track or that the author had no clue what he was talking >>>about in that document. -- Rex Brooks GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com Email: rexb@starbourne.com Tel: 510-849-2309 Fax: By Request
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2004 10:26:10 UTC