- From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:09:10 -0700
- To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Cc: "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
> SRT: All: > > Given the request for review and given that choreographies may be > subject to something similar for location it is a good idea if we > start the process of review and requirements gathering for this piece > of work and then get back to them in a timely fashion. mm1: Steve, these requirements should be generic as Reg/Rep also handles web services and had a Semantic Content Management subgroup. Suggest we distribute to both groups. Kathryn Breininger is the OASIS co-chair (kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com) and Farrukh Najmi, the technical lead (farrukh.najmi@sun.com). Thanks. >> Resent-From: public-sws-ig@w3.org >> From: Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> >> Date: 6 February 2004 03:02:05 GMT >> To: public-sws-ig@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, >> semanticweb@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: UDDI and sematics >> >> Hi all, >> >> As some of you may be aware, UDDI Technical Committee is considering >> to add some semantic capabilities in the next version. >> >> I would invite a wider community to review our attempts. >> >> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5337/uddi-spec-tc- >> req11-14-semantics-20040205.doc >> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5322/uddi-spec-tc- >> taxonomies-discussion-20040205.doc >> >> Your feedback is very welcome. Feel free to say that we are on a >> wrong track or that the author had no clue what he was talking about >> in that document. >
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2004 08:09:17 UTC