- From: Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz <sambrosz@IPIPAN.Waw.PL>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 13:03:25 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- cc: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>, Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Burdett, David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Jeff Mischkinsky wrote: > > > >IMHO, the main limitation of the upper part of WSDL is the lack of > >definition of service type. Without this definition it is merely an IDL, > >IMO. > > Based upon the WSD WG meeting currently ongoing (guess where I am? :-), I > think it is reasonable to assume that this will be added to WSDL. > > jeff If you mean the resolution proposed by Sanjiva Weerawarana, then it it not the case. The problem with service type can not be resolved by introducing yet another xsd:element. Anyway, I am very eager to see this resolution. Stanislaw
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 07:03:45 UTC