- From: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 03:58:05 -0700
- To: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- CC: Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz <sambrosz@IPIPAN.Waw.PL>, Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>, Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Burdett, David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
I'm guessing walking all the way from CDG to Rennes wasn't a big problem after all ;-) arkin Jeff Mischkinsky wrote: > At 03:34 AM 5/13/2003, Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz wrote: > >> > So if anyone has an opinion for or against WSDL, can you please >> clarify >> > whether you refer to the WSDL services, WSDL interfaces or WSDL >> whole. I >> > think that alone would bring a bit more agreement into the discussion. >> > >> > arkin >> >> IMHO, the main limitation of the upper part of WSDL is the lack of >> definition of service type. Without this definition it is merely an IDL, >> IMO. > > > Based upon the WSD WG meeting currently ongoing (guess where I am? > :-), I think it is reasonable to assume that this will be added to WSDL. > > jeff > > >> Stanislaw >
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 07:00:37 UTC