- From: Anders W. Tell <opensource@toolsmiths.se>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 16:15:55 +0200
- To: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>
- CC: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote: >Another big advantage of using MOF is that you can readily store the >corresponding definitions (e.g. choreography definitions) in a MOF >compliant repository which are standard components. > >There is also very little constraints (as I understand it) to take a >metamodel and make it MOF compliant. > Its simpler than one thinks, Personally I used Poseidon UML tool (free) to create a UML 15 model for BPSS and CoreComponents. Then I ran a tool UML2MOF to generate/translate the MOF metamodel. A well though out metamodel is usually easy to translate, once one handles relations/associations properly. In the ArgoUML team were working towards MOF and UML2 compliance. /anders
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 10:17:07 UTC