- From: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:08:33 -0400
- To: "'Monica J. Martin'" <monica.martin@sun.com>, "'Anders W. Tell'" <opensource@toolsmiths.se>
- Cc: "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Another big advantage of using MOF is that you can readily store the corresponding definitions (e.g. choreography definitions) in a MOF compliant repository which are standard components. There is also very little constraints (as I understand it) to take a metamodel and make it MOF compliant. Jean-Jacques >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] >>On Behalf Of Monica J. Martin >>Sent: Freitag, 20. Juni 2003 09:28 >>To: Anders W. Tell >>Cc: Martin Chapman; public-ws-chor@w3.org >>Subject: Re: FW: BPSS_f2f_june03.ppt >> >> >>> >>> >>>> mm1: What is your view Anders, in the context of your area of >>>> expertise and/or as a member of this team? >>> >>> >>> View of what Monica? You know my view of next maintenance release of >>> BPSS which I posted in appropriate BPSS team forum. I dont want to >>> burden this with out of scope issues. >> >> >>mm1: Your answer below is what I was looking for: (1) Rationale for >>consideration of MOF, (2) Your work and the ongoing work of UML 2.0 >> >>> >>> I can share one view with you that may interest this groups and that >>> is how I prefer to create meta models. Its the same principle Ive used >>> for BPSS and CoreComponents. >>> >>> I have a strong preference to create meta models based on MOF which is >>> the same meta meta model used to define UML. By using MOF I can create >>> java API's, XML Schema, reading writing source code automatically >>> using standardized specifications. Kind of nifty since all I have to >>> do is create one single file and the rest us generated automatically. >>> The manipilation java binary code is actually generated on te fly when >>> loading the metamodel. The best is that all is open source ! >>> ........ >> >>mm1: If you raise concerns, explanations such as these will be helpful >>for the group to evaluate what formalisms they deem appropriate for >>their area of interest. >> >>Thanks.
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 10:09:09 UTC