RE: Requirements: Decision Points Requirement Proposals

Yes, the rewording seems more clear to me.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:02 PM
> To: Ugo Corda; WS Chor Public
> Subject: RE: Requirements: Decision Points Requirement Proposals
> 
> 
> How about?
> 
> The WS-Chor choreography description format MUST make it 
> possible to specify
> a role's binding to an actual web service instance either 
> statically, when a
> web service using that choreography is deployed, or 
> dynamically at run time
> where the role may potentially be rebound multiple times.
> 
> 			Yaron
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:46 PM
> > To: Yaron Y. Goland; WS Chor Public
> > Subject: RE: Requirements: Decision Points Requirement Proposals
> >
> >
> >
> > > The WS-Chor choreography description format MUST make it
> > possible to specify
> > > a role's binding to an actual web service instance either
> > statically, when a
> > > web service using that choreography is deployed, or dynamically
> > at run time.
> >
> > Does this include the possibility of changing the binding during
> > the run, or should the dynamic binding for a particular role
> > happen only once during the run?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Ugo
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 15:51:38 UTC