- From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:59:47 -0500
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
Greetings, I took an action to attempt a second revision of our mission statement, taking into account all of the comments and discussion surrounding the first draft. I've tried to gather all of the commentary and unify the various proposals. In my role as WG member I don't agree with some of the comments; in my role as editor I've tried to be fair and account for all the varying views. As a group, we need to make some fundamental decisions about where we are going. Do we tie our work to WSDL? Do we deal with the problem of run-time dynamics? Peer-to-peer or hub and spoke or both? All of these issues need to be decided, which is why I doubt that this will be the final revision of this misson statement. I've actually come up with two possible mission statements as below. They each take a different approach to our mission. Let's discuss both options and see where it leads us. Just for review, here is the original first draft statement: <mission statement group = "ws-chor" type="CSF level 0" version = "1.0"> The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is to specify the means by which Web Services may collaborate with external systems, specifically in the composition of multiple services and the sequencing of messages among them. </mission statement> This version is based on comments from Yaron, Assaf, and others. I hope I'm capturing the essence of their meaning. My apologies for any violence done to your text comments. <mission statement group = "ws-chor" type="CSF level 0" version = "1.1a"> The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is to specify one or more XML-based languages building on the foundation of WSDL 1.2 to provide interoperability among Web Services in their communications and ordering of events. </mission statement> <mission statement group = "ws-chor" type="CSF level 0" version = "1.1b"> The mission of the Web Services Choreography Working Group at W3C is to specify the means by which Web Services interoperate, how composition of Web Services is performed, and how the sequencing of events among services may be regulated to ensure interoperability. </mission statement> As always, just my US$0.02, YMMV. Regards, D- ************************************************* Dr. Daniel Austin Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change! 847 793 5044 Visit http://www.grainger.com "If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I buy clothing and food." -Erasmus
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 16:59:28 UTC