RE: simultaneous execution

I agree, which is why we might have no option but to define our own way of
doing, or, alternatively, write our own separate spec in a way that could be
used by others.

There are many small specs which need standardization like this. For example
there is no standard way to specify a "MessageId" on a SOAP message. IMO, it
would be a good idea if these separate specs were developed somewhere.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Dart [mailto:jdart@tibco.com]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Burdett David
Cc: 'Assaf Arkin'; public-ws-chor@w3.org
Subject: Re: simultaneous execution


Burdett, David wrote:

> 1. We should use one of the existing specs ..
> However our spec should specify which one it is for interoperability. 

I'm not so sure about this as most of the candidates are not in a final 
release form, nor am I aware of a timeline for getting them there.

--Jon

Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 14:42:58 UTC