- From: Cummins, Fred A <fred.cummins@eds.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:39:06 -0500
- To: public-ws-chor@w3.org
I suggest that section 4.2 should be Specific Requirments. Use Cases are already covered. I don't believe it is necessary to have a use case to have a requirement, so not all requirements are use-case based. Section 5 covers the relationships. I'm not sure why there are Normative References in the appendix since this is not a specification, i.e., nothing in this document is normative. Where are the requirements that were discussed at the meeting? Fred Cummins > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net] > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:59 AM > To: public-ws-chor@w3.org > Subject: Re: Minutes and actions items 15th April 2003 > > > > ACTIONS THAT NEED SOME HELP: > > * All: Review requirements document and provide feedback > to editors. > > * All: Everyone should read the CSF(critical success > factors) part of > the WSA spec to understand what it is about. > > Could anyone in the know pls provide a uri to the WSA spec > that can be > included in teh actions of the last minutes. I think I > already have the > requirements uri but if Daniel has an update I'll include that if > appropriate. > > Cheers > > Steve T > > This email is confidential and may be protected by legal > privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please do > not copy or disclose its content but delete the email and > contact the sender immediately. Whilst we run antivirus > software on all internet emails we are not liable for any > loss or damage. The recipient is advised to run their own > antivirus software. >
Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 22:39:11 UTC