RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario] from Jim Webber on 2003-04-04 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from April 2003)

From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:55:06 +0100
To: <jdart@tibco.com>, "'Furniss Peter'" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c2faca$f2498f00$0100000a@stan>

Jon:

> In that case, it would appear there is no harm in assuming, 
> within the 
> scope of WS-Choroegraphy, that there is a WSDL + XML Schema 
> representation of ASN.1.

I am in complete agreement on that: WSDL is the right language in the
context of Web services for describing protocols, and I hope this group sees
things that way too. And it doesn't exclude the possibility of developing
"abstract-plus-binding" schemes either.

Jim

Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 11:55:07 UTC