W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Abstract messages [Was: Multi-Party Binding Scenario]

From: Jim Webber <jim.webber@arjuna.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:55:06 +0100
To: <jdart@tibco.com>, "'Furniss Peter'" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000901c2faca$f2498f00$0100000a@stan>


> In that case, it would appear there is no harm in assuming, 
> within the 
> scope of WS-Choroegraphy, that there is a WSDL + XML Schema 
> representation of ASN.1.

I am in complete agreement on that: WSDL is the right language in the
context of Web services for describing protocols, and I hope this group sees
things that way too. And it doesn't exclude the possibility of developing
"abstract-plus-binding" schemes either.

Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 11:55:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:00 UTC