Re: Progressive Concreteness of Choreography binding

Ricky Ho wrote:

>
> Assaf,
>
> Thinking more about the XSL/T approach.  I think the AbstractPO 
> doesn't need to be xsd:Any.  It can just be the following ...
>
> <complexType name="AbstractPO">
>         <element name="shippingAddress" type="Address"/>
>         <element name="totalAmount" type="xsd:float"/>
> </complexType>
>
> Because you can use a handcode XSL/T to transform any concrete PO 
> (even EDI) to the above structure.

+1

arkin

>
> Rgds, Ricky
>

Received on Thursday, 3 April 2003 13:38:37 UTC