Fwd: Reviewing WS-CDL

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Jean-Jacques Dubray" <jeanjadu@Attachmate.com>
> Date: 26 January 2005 14:48:18 GMT
> To: "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>
> Subject: RE: Reviewing WS-CDL
>
> Steve:
>
> one thing I forgot to mention, I think your group has not fully 
> resolved the WSDL dilemma about outbound operations. I had raised that 
> before, it might be that I don't understand, but you are limiting all 
> WSDLs to have inbound operations only (note that this is a 
> recommendation of WS-I). So, I did not see how in the interaction 
> element you could actually specify that this outbound operation maps 
> to this inbound operation. We are supporting this in ebBP (we call it 
> operation mapping). We can map any combination of operations to an 
> ebBP business transaction and we can also map WS operatoins together, 
> from one party to another.
>
> JJ-
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net]
> Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 11:50 AM
> To: Jean-Jacques Dubray
> Subject: Re: Reviewing WS-CDL
>
>
>
> Any luck?
>
> Cheers
>
> Steve T
>
> On 20 Jan 2005, at 05:08, Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote:
>
>> Steve;
>>
>> I appriciate your request. I will do it for Monday.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> JJ-
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net]
>> Sent: Tue 1/18/2005 12:13 PM
>> To: Jean-Jacques Dubray
>> Subject: Reviewing WS-CDL
>>
>>
>>
>> Jean-Jacques,
>>
>> Don't know if you have the time but if you do would you mind reviewing
>> WS-CDL and getting back to us with comments?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Steve T
>>
>> Last Call Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/
>> Last Call comments to: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
>>
>>
>
>