Begin forwarded message:


<excerpt><bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>From:
</color></bold>"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <<jeanjadu@Attachmate.com>

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>Date: </color></bold>26
January 2005 14:48:18 GMT

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>To: </color></bold>"Steve
Ross-Talbot" <<steve@enigmatec.net>

<bold><color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>Subject: </color>RE:
Reviewing WS-CDL

</bold>

Steve:


one thing I forgot to mention, I think your group has not fully
resolved the WSDL dilemma about outbound operations. I had raised that
before, it might be that I don't understand, but you are limiting all
WSDLs to have inbound operations only (note that this is a
recommendation of WS-I). So, I did not see how in the interaction
element you could actually specify that this outbound operation maps
to this inbound operation. We are supporting this in ebBP (we call it
operation mapping). We can map any combination of operations to an
ebBP business transaction and we can also map WS operatoins together,
from one party to another.


JJ-


________________________________


From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net]

Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 11:50 AM

To: Jean-Jacques Dubray

Subject: Re: Reviewing WS-CDL




Any luck?


Cheers


Steve T


On 20 Jan 2005, at 05:08, Jean-Jacques Dubray wrote:


<excerpt>Steve;


I appriciate your request. I will do it for Monday.


Best regards,


JJ-


________________________________


From: Steve Ross-Talbot [mailto:steve@enigmatec.net]

Sent: Tue 1/18/2005 12:13 PM

To: Jean-Jacques Dubray

Subject: Reviewing WS-CDL




Jean-Jacques,


Don't know if you have the time but if you do would you mind reviewing

WS-CDL and getting back to us with comments?


Cheers


Steve T


Last Call Document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ws-cdl-10-20041217/

Last Call comments to: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org



</excerpt>


</excerpt>