RE: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 964

As far as we are concered this is enough text to tell an xpath processor
what the "cdl:" prefix relates to.
Are we missing something?

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-ws-chor-comments-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-ws-chor-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
>Bjoern Hoehrmann
>Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:31 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
>Subject: Re: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 964
>
>
>
>* Martin Chapman wrote:
>>We discussed this at our con call  yesterday: 
>>http://www.w3.org/2005/08/02-ws-chor-irc
>>
>>The problem you are citing should be resolved by the text in the 4th 
>>paragraph of section 5.3: 
>>http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/chor/edcopies/cdl/cdl.html
>
>There is just
>
>  WS-CDL defines XPath function extensions as described in the 
>following
>  section. The function extensions are defined in the standard WS-CDL
>  namespace "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/ws-chor/cdl". The prefix "cdl:"
>  is associated with this namespace.
>
>This does not define processing of
>
>  <?xml version='1.0'?>
>  <element xmlns:cdl='... not cdl ...' xpath='cdl:example(...)' />
>
>or
>
>  <?xml version='1.0'?>
>  <element xmlns:foo='http://www.w3.org/2004/12/ws-chor/cdl'
>    xpath='foo:example(...)' />
>
>so no, this does not address my concern.
>-- 
>Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · 
>http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · >Telefon: 
>+49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim 
>· PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
>
>

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2005 13:08:37 UTC