- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:38:44 +0100
- To: <dmh@tibco.com>
- Cc: <michael.eder@nokia.com>, <dorchard@bea.com>, <public-ws-async-tf@w3.org>
David wrote: >> Isn't this the use case of a resource-constrained device (e.g., a cell >> phone) essentially polling a "server" to get requests, with the requests >> coming back in the reply to the poll and the responses going out in >> separate interactions? Michael was kind enough to point me at his earlier mail which of course i now recall reading: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-async-tf/2005Feb/0065.html I've also been wondering about the buckets being called 'one-way' and 'two-way' maybe there are some better names for to be found, or maybe better explanation is all that is required. In my mind t's the provision of a back-channel and correlation for the duration of the MEP by the underlying protocol which is the distinction, rather than the ability for messages to travel in either direction within a single conversation (connection). Paul
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 12:38:57 UTC