- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:07:39 -0700
- To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
Glen Daniels wrote: > Hi Anish: > > >>>P.S. With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also >> >>want to add >> >>>Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list. Also, do we want to >> >>say anything >> >>>about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only >> >>and its ilk? >> >>Since, MAPs are in the SOAP message (typically), I'm not sure how it >>helps enabling out-only. Don't things like SOAP-Response MEP and the >>corresponding HTTP binding fit the bill here better than MAPs? > > > Only for the "pull-like" cases. In many cases, I expect that MAPs (or > at least EPRs :)) will be used to transfer something like a > "notificationsTo" address in an interaction prior to the > server-initiated one(s). Thus MAPs provide a convenient way to ground > the "magic" without going so far as to specify exactly how it's done for > your application. I just think we should mention that they can be a > useful tool for these cases. Got it. Thx. -Anish --
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 20:11:57 UTC