- From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:24:23 -0400
- To: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-async-tf@w3.org>
Hi Anish: > > P.S. With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also > want to add > > Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list. Also, do we want to > say anything > > about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only > and its ilk? > > > > Since, MAPs are in the SOAP message (typically), I'm not sure how it > helps enabling out-only. Don't things like SOAP-Response MEP and the > corresponding HTTP binding fit the bill here better than MAPs? Only for the "pull-like" cases. In many cases, I expect that MAPs (or at least EPRs :)) will be used to transfer something like a "notificationsTo" address in an interaction prior to the server-initiated one(s). Thus MAPs provide a convenient way to ground the "magic" without going so far as to specify exactly how it's done for your application. I just think we should mention that they can be a useful tool for these cases. --Glen
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 19:24:39 UTC