- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:02:15 -0700
- To: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-async-tf@w3.org>
On Apr 11, 2005, at 5:45 AM, Glen Daniels wrote: > > Our charter indicates that we must specify how the MAPs are to be used > in order to achieve asynchrony with all WSDL 1.1 and 2.0 MEPs ([insert > list here]). At present there is no interoperable way to do this, > partially due to limitations or omissions which exist in the current > SOAP and WSDL specs. In order for the WS-Addressing group to declare > victory (and build a functional test suite), these > limitations/omissions > must be remedied. Fine. It would also be good to reflect that even once the limitations/omissions are addressed, we'll need to do some Addressing-specific work as well. > P.S. With regard to the MEP list above, I assume we also want to add > Robust-In-Only to the WSDL 2.0 list. Yes. > Also, do we want to say anything > about using MAPs as the "secret sauce" enabling Out-Only and its ilk? Good question; probably, since we have to demonstrate the use of MAPs for all MEPs. -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 19:02:23 UTC