- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:55:28 -0400
- To: tom@coastin.com
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Sorry for the delay. In case it wasn't clear from the call, that's exactly my point. The result in your example 2 is just addressing non-anon with jabber addressing non-anon So I know explicitly that jabber is available, but I don't know explicitly that mailto is or http is. The required answer in this case is addressing non-anon with jabber addressing non-anon with mailto addressing non-anon with http (addressing with non-anon could also appear, I suppose) however that happens to be realized in angle brackets. Tom Rutt wrote: > > I would like to clarify that in the second example > > addressing non-anon > addressing non-anon with Jabber > addressing non-anon with http > > is different than > addressing non-anon > > because the prior idicates that jabber and http are explicity available > > The non-anon only gives no such assurances. > > tom >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 16:00:31 UTC