- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:11:39 -0500
- To: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 14:12:12 UTC
+1 The safest approach would be to reference the WS-Policy 1.5 Primer and Guidelines for information on intersection and compatibility, etc. Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris phone: +1 508 377 9295 public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 03/02/2007 05:14:27 PM: > Reviewing Tom?s proposals I?m curious why we have section 3.1.6 on > finding compatible policies at all. It seems like primer material > that doesn?t belong in the spec. Even then the policy framework > determines policy compatibility. So why are we describing that gain > in our specification? I would expect the policy primer to cover > this. I suggest we remove section 3.1.6.
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 14:12:12 UTC