- From: David Illsley <david.illsley@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:43:41 +0000
- To: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
It's there to make it simpler to use the WS-A assertions. I agree that it's more complex than it needs to be but I personally believe that 'how to solve a real world problem' help in specs make them easier to consume in the long run. David David Illsley Web Services Development MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) david.illsley@uk.ibm.com From: Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com> To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org> Date: 03/02/2007 10:16 PM Subject: Why do we need Section 3.16 Reviewing Tom?s proposals I?m curious why we have section 3.1.6 on finding compatible policies at all. It seems like primer material that doesn?t belong in the spec. Even then the policy framework determines policy compatibility. So why are we describing that gain in our specification? I would expect the policy primer to cover this. I suggest we remove section 3.1.6. Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 19:43:59 UTC