- From: Gilbert Pilz <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:08:08 -0800
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C02B9EE5E@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
While working on my AI to write-up our conclusions from the concall of 11/27 I realized that we haven't discussed where the policies that contain WS-Addr assertions MAY/SHOULD/MUST be attached as per Web Services Policy - Attachement [1]. Here are some things we need to figure out: 1.) What is the permissible set of "policy subjects" for policies containing WS-Addr assertions? 2.) What is the permissible set of WSDL elements for attaching policies containing WS-Addr assertions (e.g. wsdl:binding, wsdl:message, wsdl:portyType, etc.)? 3.) To what degree should the answer to the above questions be constrained by the fact that we already say: "The wsaw:UsingAddressing element SHOULD appear as a child of the wsdl:binding element. Alternatively, the wsaw:UsingAddressing element MAY instead be included as a child of the wsdl20:endpoint (or wsdl11:port) when an endpoint intends to indicate compliance with WS-Addressing for a specific endpoint only." [2] [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20060927/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/#uaee - gp
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 21:09:01 UTC