RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

If you're returning a soap envelope in an HTTP response, by definition
you're not using a one-way binding.  

 

This doesn't affect the MEP in play because there is no MEP with soap
1.1.  

 

Dave

 

________________________________

From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:34 AM
To: David Orchard
Cc: WS-Addressing; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

 


<decloak> 

Dave, 

I have *significant* heartburn with this as it precludes the use case of
sending a 
WS-RM SequenceAcknowledgement (or other infrastructure-level signal) as
a 
SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. 

The use case is considered to be of critical importance to a number of
customers 
with which I have dealt who want to leverage WS-RM for both oneway and
asynch 
request response message flows between business partners. 

This proposed binding simply carries forward the mistake that the WS-I
BP 1.x 
made with R2714 and R2750 (which I argued against at the time). 

I've got another post still in draft responding to another thread on
this matter 
that I will be sending shortly. 

</decloak> 

Cheers, 

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295 

public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 01/20/2006 01:09:47 PM:

> Here's an xml spec xml and html version of a one-way HTTP Binding. 
>   
> Cheers, 
> Dave[attachment "soap11onewayhttpbinding.xml" deleted by Christopher
> B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] [attachment "soap11onewayhttpbinding.html" 
> deleted by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM]