RE: Proposal for CR33

Yup - the entire naming issue is a problem.  Obviously the current name 
"Anonymous" doesn't
convey what this CR is trying get to.  And as you and other have pointed 
out perhaps "Connection"
isn't right either.  I think it might be useful to first figure out what 
this WSDL element is trying to
define and then pick a name.

So, let's start with this....

If the wsaw:ZZZ element were defined with the proper terminology to say 
that this element
is trying to convey whether or not the endpoint supports the notion of 
sending responses
(either normal or faults) asynchronously - would that be something people 
could
support? 

(I'm not asking for people to agree to the term 'asynchronously' but 
rather to just the
idea that everyone knows what it is supposed to mean.  If we can get 
agreement to 
on the idea then we can move on to finding the right wording.)

thanks
-Doug




"Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> 
08/30/2006 12:32 PM

To
"Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, 
<public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
cc
Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Subject
RE: Proposal for CR33






Still digesting this, but one comment is simply on the terminology and
names.  The concept (e.g. the property name) is termed "addressable
response endpoint" yet the syntax is named wsa:NewConnection.  Perhaps a
unified name like wsaw:Addressable would be more appropriate.  Although
"addressable" as a term does seem to include the anonymous URI so maybe
that doesn't work either...

I'm also concerned the preoccupation with "new connection" is
SOAP-Binding specific.  The WS-A Core doesn't mention connections at all
when defining the anonymous URI.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anish Karmarkar
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:10 AM
> To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Cc: Doug Davis
> Subject: Proposal for CR33
> 
> Dug and I took an action during this week's call to send out a
proposal
> for CR33 [1]. Word version of the proposal is attached. It is a marked
> up version of section 3.2 [2] of the WS-Addressing 1.0 -- WSDL Binding
> spec. PDF (diffed and non-diffed  versions) are also attached.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/cr-issues/Overview.html#cr33
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/#anonelement