- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:32:34 -0700
- To: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Cc: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>
Still digesting this, but one comment is simply on the terminology and names. The concept (e.g. the property name) is termed "addressable response endpoint" yet the syntax is named wsa:NewConnection. Perhaps a unified name like wsaw:Addressable would be more appropriate. Although "addressable" as a term does seem to include the anonymous URI so maybe that doesn't work either... I'm also concerned the preoccupation with "new connection" is SOAP-Binding specific. The WS-A Core doesn't mention connections at all when defining the anonymous URI. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anish Karmarkar > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:10 AM > To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Cc: Doug Davis > Subject: Proposal for CR33 > > Dug and I took an action during this week's call to send out a proposal > for CR33 [1]. Word version of the proposal is attached. It is a marked > up version of section 3.2 [2] of the WS-Addressing 1.0 -- WSDL Binding > spec. PDF (diffed and non-diffed versions) are also attached. > > -Anish > -- > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/cr-issues/Overview.html#cr33 > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-ws-addr-wsdl-20060529/#anonelement
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 16:33:11 UTC