- From: Conor P. Cahill <concahill@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:30:52 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- cc: "John Kemp" <john.kemp@nokia.com>, "ext Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <markn@bea.com>, WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
David Orchard wrote on 10/16/2005, 1:09 PM: > > WSA does allow for it. Create a new QName like wsalt:address, define > the semantics, and put it in EPR instances. WSA just didn't want to get > into the business of defining the semantics of duping the wsa:address > for EPRs everywhere. That is no different than carrying the other addresses in Metadat, thus carrying equivalent data in two different locations. That doesn't make alot of sense to me and I think it will result in the same information being carried in different locations by different profiles as each profile makes up their own alternative location for the equivalent data. I don't understand what you mean by "duping the wsa:address for EPRs everywhere." We aren't talking about duping anything. We are talking about carrying multiple physical endpoints in a single EPR describing a single logical endpoint. I think that it is very appropriate for an addressing specification to deal with the fact that a logical endpoint *may* have multiple physical endpoints. Conor
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2005 23:31:24 UTC