- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:03:30 -0700
- To: Arun Gupta <Arun.Gupta@Sun.COM>
- CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
There aren't any required/mustUnderstand rules for attribute extensions (which is what wsaw:Action is) in WSDL. If wsaw:Action is present without a wsaw:UsingAddressing on the corresponding binding/port then I would think it would be up to the WSDL processor to decide whether it wants to ignore wsaw:Action or not (in which case it will have to engage ws-addressing). -Anish -- Arun Gupta wrote: > > If the WSDL does not contain wsaw:UsingAddressing in either wsdl:binding > or wsdl:port but some of the wsdl:portType/ wsdl:operation(s) contain > wsaw:Action, what is the expected behavior in such case ? > > I would expect that we ignore wsaw:Action on wsdl:operation. WSDL > Binding does not seem to say anything about such a case. > > -Arun
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:03:40 UTC