Re: XML 1.1 support in Addressing: arguments, counter-arguments, and consequences from Rich Salz on 2005-07-27 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from July 2005)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:30:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0507271927140.16833-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> Consequences of not adding support for XML 1.1 in the specification:
>
> It will require a new version of the specification in order to add
> proper support for XML 1.1, once there is an XML Schema language that
> supports it but, compared to the work of developing a new binding, the
> task will not be harder.

I don't understand this.  Wouldn't we still need some new documents,
e.g., to talk about the XML 1.1 serialization?

	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 23:30:44 UTC