- From: <michael.eder@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:30:56 -0400
- To: <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Hi Mark, Nothing earth shattering, but my comments: Add Before: plh: uncomfortable if not have 4 complete implementations of required features MSEder: Asked plh to clarify what were his intentions when he created the charter. Add After: mnot: how do people feel about 4-2? <bob> just drop all of the optionals now and be done with it <Katy> I like the 4-2 proposal MSeder: Likes Jonathan's proposal because if gives us two implementations of all the optional features as complete implementations of the whole specification including the required parts and the optional parts of the specification. Regards, Michael Eder Nokia -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Mark Nottingham Sent: July 25, 2005 11:22 PM To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Minutes of the 2005-07-25 teleconference ... are available for review at: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/07/25-ws-addr-minutes.html and attached for convenience.
Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2005 15:31:13 UTC