- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:13:16 -0400
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- CC: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Rich Salz wrote:
>
> According to my reading of your diff.html, it seems that what you did
> is replace things "xs:any" with "xs:any in XML 1.0 Serialization" and
> do not
he put {any} outside the paren
> add anything about XML 1.1 serialization. Therefore, the document
> still only defines XML 1.0, although it makes XML 1.1, etc., legal
> because they are "out of scope"; someone would still have to do the
> work to normatively define what the XML 1.1 equivalents are.
>
> I don't see the benefit of this change.
>
> I have a simpler proposal which achieves the same result: add text
> like the following somewhere in the notational conventions section:
> Note that all schema constructs in this document are to be
> taken as XML Schema 1.0 for XML 1.0 serialization
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2005 20:14:07 UTC