- From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:00:36 +1100
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 21:01:10 UTC
What? I can't tell someone to retry after a millennium? :-) You are assuming a unit of measure of milliseconds. If we move to a unit of say, microseconds, then an xs:unsignedInt becomes inadequate. I'd rather use a 64 bit integer to ensure that we have heaps of headroom. Tony Rogers -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Rich Salz Sent: Tue 01-Mar-05 6:43 To: Jonathan Marsh Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks > tooling. I propose we define RetryAfter as xs:unsignedLong. Hmm, /1000/86400/365.25/1000000 means about 584 million years, right? If you pick xs:unsignedInt we fit into 32 bits and get /1000/86400 or about 49 days. I propose we define RetryAfter as xs:unsignedInt /r$, looking forward to seeing you folks tomorrow :) -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 21:01:10 UTC